I was going to retire for the night, but then I realized that I wanted to complain about work. Or something like it. I've noticed a lot of annoying trends in the two years that I've worked at Verizon Wireless, (OK, it's not so much of a secret where I work anyway) all of them not very necessary. Then again, I think some of them are things that anyone who works at a medium to large sized company would experience. Like:
1.(Absolutely Pointless) Mass E-Mails
I probably get anywhere from 60-100 e-mails per day at work, that number is about 20-50 on the weekends (I could go into an extended rant on working weekends but this is not fmylife.com). MAYBE ten of those e-mails per day are actually relevant. Seriously. Some of them contain actual important stuff (policy changes, how-to information, following up on other customers). The rest can range from a superior who is never around anyway finding it necessary to tell us all that he/she won't be around to someone sending an e-mail to everyone asking if they are having 'any problems with (insert issue and location here).'
Now obviously, this is will sound rather 'holier than thou'--but why would you send an e-mail asking your co-workers if they are having problems with (let's just say text messaging)? WE ARE HERE AT WORK WITH YOU, WE ARE NOT HAVING ANY PROBLEMS AT ALL. These are 'company' e-mails, so would it not be in your best interest to ACTUALLY MAKE SENSE? Really?
(I digress.)
I just think it's much more efficient in most of these situations to actually just ASK SOMEONE AROUND YOU. We all sit (tech/global) in the same area, is it that hard to just ask someone. We even have an IM application that you can use. There's no need to send out an e-mail to everyone asking for a code when you can just get the answer in an instant. Now once again, maybe I'm being a little bitter. Obviously, I don't think I am.
2.Colleagues who are no help
We're supposed to be a team. It's more like a battle royal, every call center/department for itself. Since most of the people in my department can handle any kind of account/call, we're a target. We're the cleanup crew/fallback plan/big brother all rolled up into one. And no, it's not fun. 93 percent of the time, calls that are transferred to us have had little to no prior troubleshooting/important information uncovered by the representative bringing the caller to me. For lack of a better term, they basically greet the customer before actually having us DO THE WORK. Generally, we are available for escalated technical concerns/ordering any global-related equipment or accessories. That's about it. With that 93 percent of people who DON'T ACTUALLY TRY TO FIND OUT WHAT'S GOING ON. Yes, I'm a little passionate about this.
3.Lack of Sufficient Amounts of Ice Cream
OK, so this is more of a personal preference. And yes, this is just me throwing this in to make three gripes. And yes, I want ice cream all the time, work or no work. Oh well, I make no apologies!!!
Now it's obvious I could just get over these things to try and enjoy work a little more. But then again, my gripes could be lessened if people TRY A LITTLE HARDER. That's not impossible, is it?
Sunday, April 26, 2009
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
Almost.
Finally, I'm going to have to join the party.
I'm currently thisclose to getting my own Twitter. I know, I know, I'm just giving into the machine. And yes, I can let people know what I'm doing via Facebook. Hell, I'm doing enough of that as we speak. But I want to so bad. I don't know what it is. I even got over my initial fears for being 'just like everybody else,' among others:
-Would I really consistently update? I'm going to go with absolutely. I check Facebook about every hour or so. The only reason I don't constantly update my status is because I'm not quite ready to throw my sensational wit around like that. OK, so maybe that's being a bit bold, but I was running out of real reason here.
-Why does it have to be called 'tweeting?' All I can think of is the singer Tweet dancing around touching herself when I hear the word 'tweet.' So maybe this was just a personal gripe when I was 'rebelling against the establishment.' It's almost as valid a reason to not be on Twitter as saying, "I'm not going to vote for Barack HUSSEIN Obama EVER!!!!" (Yeah, don't think that idea worked out quite well, now did it?)
-I don't have a good picture. Once again, petty excuse. A similar excuse is "But I don't like any of my gym clothes, which is why I don't work out." (I've never heard anyone say this, by the way. It just sounds like something one would say.) Anyway, I have this sparkling new webcam to take care of that.
-I told people I would NEVER, EVER get a Twitter page. OK, so maybe I only told two people that. And I'm sure it wasn't in that exact quote. Even if it was, we were born to lie. Or, change our minds at least.
So there you have it. I just spent a good twenty minutes telling you why I'm now going against my my original stance for something that hasn't even happened yet. Sounds a whole lot like the 5674 mock NFL drafts you see floating around the place.
Idol on the Mind
Thanks a lot, Lil Rounds, for giving us all that turd sandwich of a performance last night. I suppose this is exactly what I get for trying to have someone's back when they don't even know me. Or when they may not have been that good to begin with. Of course, we're still on course for an Adam vs. Allison showdown that will shake the earth to its core.
No Regard For Human Life!
Yes, I'm absolutely excited about the start of the NBA Playoffs. There was a debate on ESPN76 the other day over the question of whether or not the NBA Playoffs are better than the NCAA basketball tournament. I'm not sure what side of the argument you may be on, but there is really no comparison here. We are comparing COLLEGE to PROFESSIONAL here. Amateurs to people who get paid for it.
The main draw of March Madness is not the Cinderella story, or the crazy finishes. It's the money. Why do you think CBS is paying the NCAA bailout-like money to broadcast the tournament? Why do you think they give you so many ways to print out a bracket? Do the words 'office pool' have any significance to you? Are you really going to remember how you did in your bracket this year when next year rolls around? (Do not answer that question if you are the author of this blog) Cinderella? Do you even remember that Davidson was in the Elite Eight last year, or that George Mason was in the Final Four in 2006? Of course not. (If you do remember that, then good for you! Smartass.) Don't give me the "well they care more in college" argument either. Well, I'd care if I had a chance to be a champion too!!!
As for the NBA Playoffs, there are moments that stick out with you. It's much easier to try and get to know the teams and the players, because there's not such a large chance that players will not be there next year. (Happens quite a bit in college with the insane NBA one year rule) It's actually a journey. A minimum of 16 games to become the best. A maximum of 28. An unquestioned winner at the end. And alcohol being sprayed all over everyone. I can't say I've seen that last statement happen for the NCAA tournament just yet. Well, at least legally. And of course, there are moments like this:
Look, I'm not saying I don't like the NCAA tournament. I get stuck on it just like everyone else. I'm just saying that it's quite unfair to compare it to the NBA Playoffs.
Isn't that clip just awesome? Keep watching it, I don't mind!
I'm currently thisclose to getting my own Twitter. I know, I know, I'm just giving into the machine. And yes, I can let people know what I'm doing via Facebook. Hell, I'm doing enough of that as we speak. But I want to so bad. I don't know what it is. I even got over my initial fears for being 'just like everybody else,' among others:
-Would I really consistently update? I'm going to go with absolutely. I check Facebook about every hour or so. The only reason I don't constantly update my status is because I'm not quite ready to throw my sensational wit around like that. OK, so maybe that's being a bit bold, but I was running out of real reason here.
-Why does it have to be called 'tweeting?' All I can think of is the singer Tweet dancing around touching herself when I hear the word 'tweet.' So maybe this was just a personal gripe when I was 'rebelling against the establishment.' It's almost as valid a reason to not be on Twitter as saying, "I'm not going to vote for Barack HUSSEIN Obama EVER!!!!" (Yeah, don't think that idea worked out quite well, now did it?)
-I don't have a good picture. Once again, petty excuse. A similar excuse is "But I don't like any of my gym clothes, which is why I don't work out." (I've never heard anyone say this, by the way. It just sounds like something one would say.) Anyway, I have this sparkling new webcam to take care of that.
-I told people I would NEVER, EVER get a Twitter page. OK, so maybe I only told two people that. And I'm sure it wasn't in that exact quote. Even if it was, we were born to lie. Or, change our minds at least.
So there you have it. I just spent a good twenty minutes telling you why I'm now going against my my original stance for something that hasn't even happened yet. Sounds a whole lot like the 5674 mock NFL drafts you see floating around the place.
Idol on the Mind
Thanks a lot, Lil Rounds, for giving us all that turd sandwich of a performance last night. I suppose this is exactly what I get for trying to have someone's back when they don't even know me. Or when they may not have been that good to begin with. Of course, we're still on course for an Adam vs. Allison showdown that will shake the earth to its core.
No Regard For Human Life!
Yes, I'm absolutely excited about the start of the NBA Playoffs. There was a debate on ESPN76 the other day over the question of whether or not the NBA Playoffs are better than the NCAA basketball tournament. I'm not sure what side of the argument you may be on, but there is really no comparison here. We are comparing COLLEGE to PROFESSIONAL here. Amateurs to people who get paid for it.
The main draw of March Madness is not the Cinderella story, or the crazy finishes. It's the money. Why do you think CBS is paying the NCAA bailout-like money to broadcast the tournament? Why do you think they give you so many ways to print out a bracket? Do the words 'office pool' have any significance to you? Are you really going to remember how you did in your bracket this year when next year rolls around? (Do not answer that question if you are the author of this blog) Cinderella? Do you even remember that Davidson was in the Elite Eight last year, or that George Mason was in the Final Four in 2006? Of course not. (If you do remember that, then good for you! Smartass.) Don't give me the "well they care more in college" argument either. Well, I'd care if I had a chance to be a champion too!!!
As for the NBA Playoffs, there are moments that stick out with you. It's much easier to try and get to know the teams and the players, because there's not such a large chance that players will not be there next year. (Happens quite a bit in college with the insane NBA one year rule) It's actually a journey. A minimum of 16 games to become the best. A maximum of 28. An unquestioned winner at the end. And alcohol being sprayed all over everyone. I can't say I've seen that last statement happen for the NCAA tournament just yet. Well, at least legally. And of course, there are moments like this:
Look, I'm not saying I don't like the NCAA tournament. I get stuck on it just like everyone else. I'm just saying that it's quite unfair to compare it to the NBA Playoffs.
Isn't that clip just awesome? Keep watching it, I don't mind!
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
Melt my heart to stone.
So my roommate's sister was over for dinner tonight, and she complained (mildly) about how the majority of her friends have given unfavorable criticism over her deciding to join the Air Force next month. The consensus was that she was making a huge mistake, and she was 'throwing her life away.'
Oh, to be 19 again!
Anyway, I really sympathized with her. Now, I don't have much experience in this arena. I have not decided (nor will I ever, as far as I'm concerned) to serve my country in any capacity other than paying taxes. But if I had ever made that decision, I would hope that my friends would have been at least somewhat supportive. I think it's a very honorable sacrifice a person makes when they decide to serve their country. I did not think the wars in Iraq/Afghanistan were the best idea, but I've always been appreciative of the job the soldiers who have served in those wars have done. (And any wars/aid/patrol before that)
(Now I've never really gone along with the 'they are protecting our freedom' reasoning. I must say, there's never really been a moment in my life where my freedom as an American has been compromised. Yes, I've felt pretty comfortable here. Not really worried about the government or military being overthrown any time soon, 24 be damned.)
Before I actually gained enough sense to have opinions that made sense, I saw the military as a last resort. The sort of thing someone does when they didn't want to do/weren't able to adapt to college. Or something that you did because it was a family tradition. So my opinion of people I knew who decided to go to the military was, 'Wow, that sucks for them.' But now I know better. It takes a lot to potentially pick up your life, most likely leave all your family and friends behind, only for something that could potentially cost you your life. That takes a lot of courage.
So what does this really mean? Obviously, my roommate's sister needs some new friends.
Idol on the mind
I find it fitting that even with one less performer, and with only two judges critiquing after each song, the show STILL RAN OUT OF TIME. Do the judges not realize that they are not the draw of the show? I know they have a strong influence...but they always say too much at throughout the show...only for the show to end abruptly and disjointed. Might be something we want to work on, producers.
Oh, to be 19 again!
Anyway, I really sympathized with her. Now, I don't have much experience in this arena. I have not decided (nor will I ever, as far as I'm concerned) to serve my country in any capacity other than paying taxes. But if I had ever made that decision, I would hope that my friends would have been at least somewhat supportive. I think it's a very honorable sacrifice a person makes when they decide to serve their country. I did not think the wars in Iraq/Afghanistan were the best idea, but I've always been appreciative of the job the soldiers who have served in those wars have done. (And any wars/aid/patrol before that)
(Now I've never really gone along with the 'they are protecting our freedom' reasoning. I must say, there's never really been a moment in my life where my freedom as an American has been compromised. Yes, I've felt pretty comfortable here. Not really worried about the government or military being overthrown any time soon, 24 be damned.)
Before I actually gained enough sense to have opinions that made sense, I saw the military as a last resort. The sort of thing someone does when they didn't want to do/weren't able to adapt to college. Or something that you did because it was a family tradition. So my opinion of people I knew who decided to go to the military was, 'Wow, that sucks for them.' But now I know better. It takes a lot to potentially pick up your life, most likely leave all your family and friends behind, only for something that could potentially cost you your life. That takes a lot of courage.
So what does this really mean? Obviously, my roommate's sister needs some new friends.
Idol on the mind
I find it fitting that even with one less performer, and with only two judges critiquing after each song, the show STILL RAN OUT OF TIME. Do the judges not realize that they are not the draw of the show? I know they have a strong influence...but they always say too much at throughout the show...only for the show to end abruptly and disjointed. Might be something we want to work on, producers.
Thursday, April 9, 2009
Finally, the blind guy is gone.
A Very Loose Take on My Daily Activity
Hot or Not, April 2009
Hot
-Bailouts
-Working for AIG
-Being the president of the United States in Europe and not have the name 'George Bush'
-A new baseball season
-The Adam/Allison duo on American Idol. No homo.
-Getting closer to pool/beach time
-Season 7 of 24. Has anyone noticed that they haven't eaten AT ALL in about 7 years?
-Car manufacturers wanting to pay your car payment.
-The imminent NBA Playoff season.
Not
-Paula Abdul on American Idol. I could have said that since 2002, really.
-Me filling out NCAA brackets. I may mention this from time to time.
-The Braves' bullpen.
-Not paying attention while driving.
-Pollen
-Anyone not named Adam/Allison on American Idol. Just pack it up, folks.
-Michigan State in the championship game. Ye gods.
-Lindsay Lohan back on the market
Ice Cold
-Samantha Ronson on the market. She's like 58 years old? Seriously?
Hot or Not, April 2009
Hot
-Bailouts
-Working for AIG
-Being the president of the United States in Europe and not have the name 'George Bush'
-A new baseball season
-The Adam/Allison duo on American Idol. No homo.
-Getting closer to pool/beach time
-Season 7 of 24. Has anyone noticed that they haven't eaten AT ALL in about 7 years?
-Car manufacturers wanting to pay your car payment.
-The imminent NBA Playoff season.
Not
-Paula Abdul on American Idol. I could have said that since 2002, really.
-Me filling out NCAA brackets. I may mention this from time to time.
-The Braves' bullpen.
-Not paying attention while driving.
-Pollen
-Anyone not named Adam/Allison on American Idol. Just pack it up, folks.
-Michigan State in the championship game. Ye gods.
-Lindsay Lohan back on the market
Ice Cold
-Samantha Ronson on the market. She's like 58 years old? Seriously?
Tuesday, April 7, 2009
PC Mover is a fraud!!!
It's Tuesday night. Which means American Idol was ready to take over the TV. Tonight's episode got me fired up.
(I must forewarn you first by letting you know that I really only have a vested interest in two contestants: Adam and Allison. If they are not the final two contestants for this season, then I will not care. That would seriously just make the show second rate. They are on an entirely different level (with Adam markedly ahead of Allison at this point--I'm crowning him right now. Mark it down, you read it here first.) than the other remaining six people. I don't even know all their names, simply because they do not matter at this point.)
I never thought that I would go down this road, but I have to stick up for Lil Rounds (This is the great next rapper name waiting to happen. And can you believe that this is her REAL NAME? Maybe her family knew she was destined to drop bars while Lil was in the womb. To hell with American Idol, Lil...get with Lil Wayne and form a Lil Dynasty.). She's come out week after week and done a very respectable job no matter what week they've had. Yet time and time again, the judges find a way to rip her a new asshole. If it's not the song selection, (and if you give the people the option of choosing whatever song they'd like, could you please drop the whole 'that just wasn't the right song for you' critique? If you don't like the choice of song, why don't you just choose the songs for them? Can we not just take the performance itself and judge THAT?) it's imploring Lil to take a song and make it 'her own.' Such was the case tonight. She did a pretty impressive job on Tina Turner's 'What's Love Got To Do With It.' Yet again, the judges slaughtered her for it. Blatantly at that. I really don't know why.
(On the flip side, Allison did a song by Bonnie Raitt that wasn't anything spectacular, same arrangement and all. But the judges felt that she was great. Maybe it's because she's 16 and awesome. But, whatever.)
I can't help but wonder why someone who has been so consistent (in a positive way nonetheless) all season has been brutally victimized for being consistent. Have they noticed that it's rather difficult to take someone else's song and make it your own? The only person who has routinely be able to do that sort of thing is Adam. Do they know something that we don't? Does she go to karaoke with the entire crew and just blow everyone out of the water? Is she some secret producer who can arrange any and every song to exactly her liking?
Or...are they placing an indirect level of pressure on Lil because she's a black female? There have been past black females who were very strong contenders. There was Jennifer Hudson (recording artist, Oscar winner) and Fantasia (winner of the show) both had a powerful presence on the show when they were there. Melinda Doolittle was most likely the best overall singer from a past season. Is that what they (the judges) expect from Lil also? Maybe they think it's some star within because she has the immortal 'Lil' name? Do the judges feel like they have to be consistent about something, in order to restore some false sense of credibility to the competition? (Because, there is so much credibility that this show has to offer.) Either way, I think it's extremely unfair. I hope that Lil finds a way to make it to the Top 5, just to make the judges suck it. Big time.
I Used To Dance With My Daddy
-The Braves are back! Two stellar pitching performances in a row---against the defending champions---in Philadelphia at a hitter's park. Yeah, I would call that 'being back.'
-Michael Jordan says he thinks he can still play at 45. You know where he'd be a good fit? The Clippers!! I mean, it's not like they've done much of anything that's made sense lately.
-If you're a quarterback who struggled mightily against the South Carolina Gamecocks, should a team really be considering drafting you number 1 overall, especially when that team didn't win a game last year? I mean, that can't make sense, right? Right????
(I must forewarn you first by letting you know that I really only have a vested interest in two contestants: Adam and Allison. If they are not the final two contestants for this season, then I will not care. That would seriously just make the show second rate. They are on an entirely different level (with Adam markedly ahead of Allison at this point--I'm crowning him right now. Mark it down, you read it here first.) than the other remaining six people. I don't even know all their names, simply because they do not matter at this point.)
I never thought that I would go down this road, but I have to stick up for Lil Rounds (This is the great next rapper name waiting to happen. And can you believe that this is her REAL NAME? Maybe her family knew she was destined to drop bars while Lil was in the womb. To hell with American Idol, Lil...get with Lil Wayne and form a Lil Dynasty.). She's come out week after week and done a very respectable job no matter what week they've had. Yet time and time again, the judges find a way to rip her a new asshole. If it's not the song selection, (and if you give the people the option of choosing whatever song they'd like, could you please drop the whole 'that just wasn't the right song for you' critique? If you don't like the choice of song, why don't you just choose the songs for them? Can we not just take the performance itself and judge THAT?) it's imploring Lil to take a song and make it 'her own.' Such was the case tonight. She did a pretty impressive job on Tina Turner's 'What's Love Got To Do With It.' Yet again, the judges slaughtered her for it. Blatantly at that. I really don't know why.
(On the flip side, Allison did a song by Bonnie Raitt that wasn't anything spectacular, same arrangement and all. But the judges felt that she was great. Maybe it's because she's 16 and awesome. But, whatever.)
I can't help but wonder why someone who has been so consistent (in a positive way nonetheless) all season has been brutally victimized for being consistent. Have they noticed that it's rather difficult to take someone else's song and make it your own? The only person who has routinely be able to do that sort of thing is Adam. Do they know something that we don't? Does she go to karaoke with the entire crew and just blow everyone out of the water? Is she some secret producer who can arrange any and every song to exactly her liking?
Or...are they placing an indirect level of pressure on Lil because she's a black female? There have been past black females who were very strong contenders. There was Jennifer Hudson (recording artist, Oscar winner) and Fantasia (winner of the show) both had a powerful presence on the show when they were there. Melinda Doolittle was most likely the best overall singer from a past season. Is that what they (the judges) expect from Lil also? Maybe they think it's some star within because she has the immortal 'Lil' name? Do the judges feel like they have to be consistent about something, in order to restore some false sense of credibility to the competition? (Because, there is so much credibility that this show has to offer.) Either way, I think it's extremely unfair. I hope that Lil finds a way to make it to the Top 5, just to make the judges suck it. Big time.
I Used To Dance With My Daddy
-The Braves are back! Two stellar pitching performances in a row---against the defending champions---in Philadelphia at a hitter's park. Yeah, I would call that 'being back.'
-Michael Jordan says he thinks he can still play at 45. You know where he'd be a good fit? The Clippers!! I mean, it's not like they've done much of anything that's made sense lately.
-If you're a quarterback who struggled mightily against the South Carolina Gamecocks, should a team really be considering drafting you number 1 overall, especially when that team didn't win a game last year? I mean, that can't make sense, right? Right????
Monday, April 6, 2009
It's winning time.
(I'm not a bracketologist. Know this, and mark it down.)
So I suppose it's only fitting that I had North Carolina losing the championship game in my disaster of a bracket. Of course they showed me how much of an idiot I was by whipping Michigan State in the championship game. So, congratulations Tar Heels. If anything, I can tell people that I went to Carolina...and they might think I'm talking about North Carolina. It would be a like, but whatever.
So, what about e-mails?
So one aspect of my job description involves me dealing with cell phone data services. Unfortunately, one data service is e-mail on your phone. Whether it be a Blackberry or an enV (there's an application called Mobile Email that can push e-mail to your phone, kind of like a Blackberry). The word e-mail makes me angry now. Apparently, that's all people care about now.
I'm not getting any e-mail. I need my e-mail.
I'm going on a cruise. Am I going to have e-mail access?
I'm taking a trip to Cuba. Just want to make sure I have e-mail coverage there.
I ABSOLUTELY NEED MY E-MAIL.
I've missed important e-mails today.
I'm going to light myself on fire if I don't get all my e-mails right now.
But my question is this: Is it REALLY that important that you have access to your e-mail on your cell phone? Are you really missing out on something that you can just as well look up on your computer? Really? More importantly, who the hell sends e-mail anymore? I don't count reader/viewer e-mail, or work communication. Let's say you're not sending an editorial comment or communicating with people at work. Who are you e-mailing? And most of the people I assist are not really sending much of anything. Rarely do I get the person who is hot and bothered about not being able to send e-mails. Most of the people I'm around find the instant access to e-mail more of an annoyance than a necessity. And not only that, if you lived and died by having your e-mail all the time, are you really depending on a cell phone to get those e-mails?
OK. I have to stop saying 'e-mail,' or I will set myself on fire. I might even be serious.
So Bristol Palin isn't quite on her way to having that wholesome marriage after all. Lee Johnston, her baby daddy, is on the talk show circuit talking about how he's never able to really spend time with his child. He even told Tyra Banks (which is kind of like me going to complain about how much I hate my job to my niece) that they had protected sex 'most of the time.' Well, I suppose he now knows the importance of proper protection every time.
(But seriously, you went on TYRA?? Was she REALLY the only person willing to take you on? Was Larry King not available? And you needed to go on a talk show because of what exactly? Are you trying to put yourself back on the market now? And since when did Tyra Banks become a reputable place to give out your side of the story? Oh, that's right...it's NEVER HAPPENED.)
Wow! Two entries in a week! I may be onto something here.
So I suppose it's only fitting that I had North Carolina losing the championship game in my disaster of a bracket. Of course they showed me how much of an idiot I was by whipping Michigan State in the championship game. So, congratulations Tar Heels. If anything, I can tell people that I went to Carolina...and they might think I'm talking about North Carolina. It would be a like, but whatever.
So, what about e-mails?
So one aspect of my job description involves me dealing with cell phone data services. Unfortunately, one data service is e-mail on your phone. Whether it be a Blackberry or an enV (there's an application called Mobile Email that can push e-mail to your phone, kind of like a Blackberry). The word e-mail makes me angry now. Apparently, that's all people care about now.
I'm not getting any e-mail. I need my e-mail.
I'm going on a cruise. Am I going to have e-mail access?
I'm taking a trip to Cuba. Just want to make sure I have e-mail coverage there.
I ABSOLUTELY NEED MY E-MAIL.
I've missed important e-mails today.
I'm going to light myself on fire if I don't get all my e-mails right now.
But my question is this: Is it REALLY that important that you have access to your e-mail on your cell phone? Are you really missing out on something that you can just as well look up on your computer? Really? More importantly, who the hell sends e-mail anymore? I don't count reader/viewer e-mail, or work communication. Let's say you're not sending an editorial comment or communicating with people at work. Who are you e-mailing? And most of the people I assist are not really sending much of anything. Rarely do I get the person who is hot and bothered about not being able to send e-mails. Most of the people I'm around find the instant access to e-mail more of an annoyance than a necessity. And not only that, if you lived and died by having your e-mail all the time, are you really depending on a cell phone to get those e-mails?
OK. I have to stop saying 'e-mail,' or I will set myself on fire. I might even be serious.
So Bristol Palin isn't quite on her way to having that wholesome marriage after all. Lee Johnston, her baby daddy, is on the talk show circuit talking about how he's never able to really spend time with his child. He even told Tyra Banks (which is kind of like me going to complain about how much I hate my job to my niece) that they had protected sex 'most of the time.' Well, I suppose he now knows the importance of proper protection every time.
(But seriously, you went on TYRA?? Was she REALLY the only person willing to take you on? Was Larry King not available? And you needed to go on a talk show because of what exactly? Are you trying to put yourself back on the market now? And since when did Tyra Banks become a reputable place to give out your side of the story? Oh, that's right...it's NEVER HAPPENED.)
Wow! Two entries in a week! I may be onto something here.
Sunday, April 5, 2009
The transistion.
So I joined the world of Mobile Professionals by getting a laptop. Which (seemingly) means that I'll be able to update more. (Of course, if this PC Mover application ever finishes, maybe I'll actually be 'mobile.') But let's just say that a lack of mobility wasn't really holding me back from posting regularly anyway. Hard to believe it's been well over a month since I last updated. I didn't even get to sweep people up in March Madness! (I burned my bracket after Day 2, thanks for asking.)
With the Garnet and Black (for that other USC/Carolina school) game coming next week, that brings college football season even closer. And yes, I'm well aware that the actual season does not start until September. But that gives me plenty of time to voice my lack of confidence in the direction of the Gamecock football program in general. Let's call this my Rush Limbaugh 'I hope he fails!' moment.
Steve Spurrier was hired in November 2004 as yet another attempt to make South Carolina football relevant again. (Never mind that somebody found the thing relevant anyway, how can a school routinely sell out an 80,250 seat stadium and not be relevant?) Granted, the team had run into yet another maddening cycle of being just good enough to make you want to set yourself on fire. After a total of 17 wins in 2001 and 2002, the team went 5-7 in 2003 and 6-5 in 2004. Not only that, the 2004 season ended with that 'can we not talk about that?' fight with Clemson in the final game of that year (which sadly kept us out of the Aldi Bowl that season). Lou Holtz had seemingly worn out his welcome, and a string of minor violations had finally caught up with the coach who had given the Gamecocks the highest level of success in about two decades. So yes, you have a very good argument for there needing to be a change.
But was The Ole Ball Coach really the way to go? Here's a guy who had won over 100 games during his time at Florida, and taken the Gators from fairly irrelevant (with ugly orange uniforms to match the helmets) to six SEC championships and one national championship. But then, he decided to leave and take a shot at coaching in the NFL. Let's just say that didn't work out so well. He spent 3 years there, doing no better than 7-9 for his first season. Now don't be alarmed, but being a coach in the NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE (courtesy Ron Jaworski) is quite different than coaching college football. I won't dispute that. So one could say that Papa Steve just wasn't cut out to be an NFL coach. But you could sense a rather...lackadaisical attitude starting to set in. Either way, with the history of the Gamecock football program, maybe a more logical plan would have been to give an opportunity to a coach who did not have such a legendary past instead of someone who obviously was only looking to make himself look good. If he won, this would be just another nugget for how great Spurrier was/is. (I mean, he did win the ACC title at Duke. DUKE.) If he didn't win, then there's the 'well no one can win at South Carolina!' excuse. A no lose situation for the coach. A no win situation for the program. Not really what you want to have.
Obviously, I'm not the one making the decisions here. So, off we went with promises of SEC titles and entering that grand stage of being a 'relevant' football program. At his first public appearance, (which happened to be the same day the SEC Championship took place) he spoke of how his goal was to one day have the Gamecocks playing in Atlanta for the SEC Championship. There was a lot of positive energy created, and most people were certain that once Spurrier was able to get his kind of players in, we would be on our way.
2005
The first real play of the season was that nice slice of pie that was able to whet the appetite just enough. It was a long pass from Blake Mitchell to Noah Whiteside for a 5 million yard touchdown. (OK, maybe it was actually only about 60 yards. But whatever.) I feel like that play alone was the one highlight of the Steve Spurrier Era. It hasn't gotten any better than that. Seriously. While the year itself had its share of highs, (beating Tennessee and Florida, being ranked near the end of the year, first bowl game in three years) there were some signs (getting destroyed by Auburn, blowing a 20+ point lead to Missouri in the Independence Bowl) that we had a long way to go. There were a couple of things to build on. The problem, of course, was actually building on that.
2006
Things didn't look so hot from the start. The starting quarterback (Blake Mitchell) did everything he could to NOT hold on to the starting job. There was the Georgia game where we didn't score at all. But even with a QB that he wasn't quite comfortable with, Papa Steve found a way to make things work. The offense seemed to make just enough plays to get the job done, which was generally the same on the defensive side. Of course, there were the moments that made you want to set yourself on fire (TWO BLOCKED FIELD GOALS AND A BLOCKED EXTRA POINT against Florida come to mind. We lost that game 17-16. I'm gargling lighter fluid as we speak.) In terms of contending for the SEC title, we were still in the middle of the pack. There was the memorable win against Clemson, as well as the emphatic win over Houston in the Liberty Bowl. At last, momentum. Who knew?
2007
At the end of Papa Steve's second year, he was given a contract extension. Not only that, he was given a raise. Mind you, the record during the first 2 years was 14-10. You get a raise for THAT? I argued with a co-worker once that Papa Steve pretty much got a raise for just showing up, and that we were really no better than we were before he arrived. Yes, we had been to two bowl games. But neither bowl was any more impressive than the two Dr. Lou took the Gamecocks to in 2001/2002. I just felt that giving a raise for mediocrity set us up for disaster. Unfortunately, I was able to supplement my argument with the 2007 season. We started off with a bang, even winning at Georgia, to start 6-1. We were ranked #6 in the BCS, and all signs pointed to (if we won out) playing for a national championship in New Orleans.
Let's just say that we just missed out on that opportunity. We lost five straight games, including allowing 99 points over two games to Arkansas and Florida. We also launched the Heisman campaigns for Darren McFadden and Tim Tebow. (No need to thank us, guys. We know you appreciate it.) We finished 6-6, no bowl, lots of embarrassment.
While the losses were hard enough, it was the reaction that seemed the most puzzling. At the beginning of the season, Papa Steve was certain that we were ready to contend for the division title. That got everybody around here absolutely PUMPED. Well, after losses, there was always the excuse of, 'Maybe we're not good enough' or 'We just don't have what it takes to win.' I don't know about you, but that's not what I want to be hearing from the guy I just gave a raise to. Where's the accountability? Why aren't you more angry that we're not contending? What will it take for you to pretend that you care? You're in college football, the players are the same ages, they have the same kind of lives. How are we consistently getting beat the same ways? What are you doing to make us better?
2008
With this past season, I got the answer to my last question. That answer was not much at all. Sure, we won more games than we lost, we beat Tennessee, lost a close game to Georgia, blah blah blah. BUT. There was the not so spectacular finish. A 56-6 loss to Florida. A 31-10 loss to Iowa in the Outback Bowl. More pathetic reasoning and excuses. Not contending for the five thousandth straight year. How's the raise working out now?
An even more troubling sign is the fact that the Gamecocks have not been good on offense. At all. Mind you, this was the thing that Papa Steve is known for. Protecting the quarterback is something that DOES NOT HAPPEN HERE. We haven't had an offense that's ranked in the top half of national statistics in any category. Well, unless there's a category for Stupidity. We'd probably be number 7 there. Something like that.
We're about to enter Year Five of the Steve Spurrier Era. And no, I don't feel any better about the direction we're headed than what I felt back in 2004. My friends, that's not a good thing! And yes, this is one man's opinion. And yes, I was never really a fan of Papa Steve ever. I also may be a little jilted because every time I've taken a day off for watching the Gamecocks, they've lost. So that could make me a little bitter. But, it would be much easier to not be so critical if it seemed like the man cared. Seriously. I must say that we have to be better this year, or it will be time to look in another direction. After five years on the job, it's time to be on the move. Yes, I understand that Florida is the defending national champion, and they are in our division. But shouldn't we be just as good as everybody else? How are we not on the same level as Georgia or Alabama? We have the same playing field. There's no other way to slice it. The end. If there's anyone that thinks otherwise, you're kidding yourself. Seriously.
So if you're now depressed about the state of Gamecock football, then I somewhat apologize. Now you're just like me.
With the Garnet and Black (for that other USC/Carolina school) game coming next week, that brings college football season even closer. And yes, I'm well aware that the actual season does not start until September. But that gives me plenty of time to voice my lack of confidence in the direction of the Gamecock football program in general. Let's call this my Rush Limbaugh 'I hope he fails!' moment.
Steve Spurrier was hired in November 2004 as yet another attempt to make South Carolina football relevant again. (Never mind that somebody found the thing relevant anyway, how can a school routinely sell out an 80,250 seat stadium and not be relevant?) Granted, the team had run into yet another maddening cycle of being just good enough to make you want to set yourself on fire. After a total of 17 wins in 2001 and 2002, the team went 5-7 in 2003 and 6-5 in 2004. Not only that, the 2004 season ended with that 'can we not talk about that?' fight with Clemson in the final game of that year (which sadly kept us out of the Aldi Bowl that season). Lou Holtz had seemingly worn out his welcome, and a string of minor violations had finally caught up with the coach who had given the Gamecocks the highest level of success in about two decades. So yes, you have a very good argument for there needing to be a change.
But was The Ole Ball Coach really the way to go? Here's a guy who had won over 100 games during his time at Florida, and taken the Gators from fairly irrelevant (with ugly orange uniforms to match the helmets) to six SEC championships and one national championship. But then, he decided to leave and take a shot at coaching in the NFL. Let's just say that didn't work out so well. He spent 3 years there, doing no better than 7-9 for his first season. Now don't be alarmed, but being a coach in the NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE (courtesy Ron Jaworski) is quite different than coaching college football. I won't dispute that. So one could say that Papa Steve just wasn't cut out to be an NFL coach. But you could sense a rather...lackadaisical attitude starting to set in. Either way, with the history of the Gamecock football program, maybe a more logical plan would have been to give an opportunity to a coach who did not have such a legendary past instead of someone who obviously was only looking to make himself look good. If he won, this would be just another nugget for how great Spurrier was/is. (I mean, he did win the ACC title at Duke. DUKE.) If he didn't win, then there's the 'well no one can win at South Carolina!' excuse. A no lose situation for the coach. A no win situation for the program. Not really what you want to have.
Obviously, I'm not the one making the decisions here. So, off we went with promises of SEC titles and entering that grand stage of being a 'relevant' football program. At his first public appearance, (which happened to be the same day the SEC Championship took place) he spoke of how his goal was to one day have the Gamecocks playing in Atlanta for the SEC Championship. There was a lot of positive energy created, and most people were certain that once Spurrier was able to get his kind of players in, we would be on our way.
2005
The first real play of the season was that nice slice of pie that was able to whet the appetite just enough. It was a long pass from Blake Mitchell to Noah Whiteside for a 5 million yard touchdown. (OK, maybe it was actually only about 60 yards. But whatever.) I feel like that play alone was the one highlight of the Steve Spurrier Era. It hasn't gotten any better than that. Seriously. While the year itself had its share of highs, (beating Tennessee and Florida, being ranked near the end of the year, first bowl game in three years) there were some signs (getting destroyed by Auburn, blowing a 20+ point lead to Missouri in the Independence Bowl) that we had a long way to go. There were a couple of things to build on. The problem, of course, was actually building on that.
2006
Things didn't look so hot from the start. The starting quarterback (Blake Mitchell) did everything he could to NOT hold on to the starting job. There was the Georgia game where we didn't score at all. But even with a QB that he wasn't quite comfortable with, Papa Steve found a way to make things work. The offense seemed to make just enough plays to get the job done, which was generally the same on the defensive side. Of course, there were the moments that made you want to set yourself on fire (TWO BLOCKED FIELD GOALS AND A BLOCKED EXTRA POINT against Florida come to mind. We lost that game 17-16. I'm gargling lighter fluid as we speak.) In terms of contending for the SEC title, we were still in the middle of the pack. There was the memorable win against Clemson, as well as the emphatic win over Houston in the Liberty Bowl. At last, momentum. Who knew?
2007
At the end of Papa Steve's second year, he was given a contract extension. Not only that, he was given a raise. Mind you, the record during the first 2 years was 14-10. You get a raise for THAT? I argued with a co-worker once that Papa Steve pretty much got a raise for just showing up, and that we were really no better than we were before he arrived. Yes, we had been to two bowl games. But neither bowl was any more impressive than the two Dr. Lou took the Gamecocks to in 2001/2002. I just felt that giving a raise for mediocrity set us up for disaster. Unfortunately, I was able to supplement my argument with the 2007 season. We started off with a bang, even winning at Georgia, to start 6-1. We were ranked #6 in the BCS, and all signs pointed to (if we won out) playing for a national championship in New Orleans.
Let's just say that we just missed out on that opportunity. We lost five straight games, including allowing 99 points over two games to Arkansas and Florida. We also launched the Heisman campaigns for Darren McFadden and Tim Tebow. (No need to thank us, guys. We know you appreciate it.) We finished 6-6, no bowl, lots of embarrassment.
While the losses were hard enough, it was the reaction that seemed the most puzzling. At the beginning of the season, Papa Steve was certain that we were ready to contend for the division title. That got everybody around here absolutely PUMPED. Well, after losses, there was always the excuse of, 'Maybe we're not good enough' or 'We just don't have what it takes to win.' I don't know about you, but that's not what I want to be hearing from the guy I just gave a raise to. Where's the accountability? Why aren't you more angry that we're not contending? What will it take for you to pretend that you care? You're in college football, the players are the same ages, they have the same kind of lives. How are we consistently getting beat the same ways? What are you doing to make us better?
2008
With this past season, I got the answer to my last question. That answer was not much at all. Sure, we won more games than we lost, we beat Tennessee, lost a close game to Georgia, blah blah blah. BUT. There was the not so spectacular finish. A 56-6 loss to Florida. A 31-10 loss to Iowa in the Outback Bowl. More pathetic reasoning and excuses. Not contending for the five thousandth straight year. How's the raise working out now?
An even more troubling sign is the fact that the Gamecocks have not been good on offense. At all. Mind you, this was the thing that Papa Steve is known for. Protecting the quarterback is something that DOES NOT HAPPEN HERE. We haven't had an offense that's ranked in the top half of national statistics in any category. Well, unless there's a category for Stupidity. We'd probably be number 7 there. Something like that.
We're about to enter Year Five of the Steve Spurrier Era. And no, I don't feel any better about the direction we're headed than what I felt back in 2004. My friends, that's not a good thing! And yes, this is one man's opinion. And yes, I was never really a fan of Papa Steve ever. I also may be a little jilted because every time I've taken a day off for watching the Gamecocks, they've lost. So that could make me a little bitter. But, it would be much easier to not be so critical if it seemed like the man cared. Seriously. I must say that we have to be better this year, or it will be time to look in another direction. After five years on the job, it's time to be on the move. Yes, I understand that Florida is the defending national champion, and they are in our division. But shouldn't we be just as good as everybody else? How are we not on the same level as Georgia or Alabama? We have the same playing field. There's no other way to slice it. The end. If there's anyone that thinks otherwise, you're kidding yourself. Seriously.
So if you're now depressed about the state of Gamecock football, then I somewhat apologize. Now you're just like me.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
